Can The Military Make How We Live Better?

The term "military" or "defence" can be used in a person sense in respect of a single soldier and what strategies the person soldier takes to defend himself equivalent to; wearing protecting tools, using armaments or establishing Military Defence protection comparable to a digging a trench or a foxhole. Defence is just another way of saying warfare, utilized by governments to replicate their non-aggressive posture in their area which does not carry the adverse connotation of conflict, equivalent to Ministry or Department of Defense.

 

In army operations planning, a defensive technique is the coverage of preventing an assault, or minimizing the damage of an attack, by the forces assuming protection in strategic depth for stopping an enemy from conquering territory. Within the scope of a national protection coverage, protection is used to incorporate most navy issues.

 

Defence ways are employed by countries for numerous reasons. For example, a superb example of using defensive technique tactics might be seen when used in opposition to American troopers in the Vietnam Conflict. By the use of smaller mobile guerrilla forces the Vietcong waged a war on the sources of the American soldiers, which included destroying supplies and supply routes. They also used the People resources when producing booby traps, including discarded items resembling tin cans in addition to unexploded bombs which they might collect and use for mines.

 

These Finally the efforts of the smaller cellular defensive guerrillas prompted such an impact that the primary army was capable of overrun the American forces with an enormous attack know as the Tet Offensive. As you'll learn if you enjoy attending Military Events. nowhere is this example extra outlined than in the Cold Struggle stand offs of the mid to late twentieth century. One specific instance of this is the Cuban Missile Crisis which concerned the US and the Soviet Union in 1962.

 

The Soviet and Cuban authorities had placed nuclear weapons on Cuba as seen by American reconnaissance planes and, with the tension between the two countries already palpable, a standoff ensued with the 'very actual' menace of a nuclear war occurring. Fortunately diplomatic proceedings ensured that the disaster was settled relatively amicably with the dismantling of the weaponry and a no-invasion settlement in place from the American authorities. The role of military defence has been gradually shifted away from its primary role of providing security to enhancing commercial interest. With industrial growth and advancement of science and technology, the defence production led to a market oriented producer- purchaser relation between the developed and developing countries.The poor nation afflicted with conflicts became a super market for defence deals.

 

For the powerful, military prowess which was earlier synonymous with political power has become a trademark of economic power. But restraining factors were at work. The intellectual circle and the wisdom acquired from past experiences as also the active international diplomacy successfully trained the world community to disarm for peace and development. The agreement to network for prosperity through friendly trades and to handle conflicts through peaceful dialogues have been endorsed vehemently. Military Articles throughout history will support the fact that if a resource is scarce and is even scarcer with rising population particularly in poor countries which are already afflicted with hunger, illiteracy and joblessness. For these countries, the preparation for an impending war, which may never occur, is a sheer wastage of precious resource in terms of man, money and material. The political compulsions may tempt the authority to take pride in the power of the defence force. The military men take great pride in themselves as the savior of the nation. With due respect and regard to the defence services, I have a considered opinion to express. I think military might is an outdated concept of exalting the national self esteem. Recent history of military powers have evidenced the fatality of this approach. The pride of the nation is in the human asset and any nation that failed to nurture its most precious asset will lose its national pride even if it owns the most sophisticated war weapons to erase the entire human race.

 

Big defence budgets in the developed world may entail an economic investment return out of defence production and sale exports. But how long can this go on? For poor countries, big defence budget produces a negative return, and hits the belly of the poor as his pie is taken away with every military purchase.In the new age, the defence security trade mark will diminish as more focus is now on economic security and sustainability of the future. The creative and innovative thinking to meet the future challenges will be a supreme consideration while war weapons will be valueless in the approaching apocalypse. There are some folks who believe that the United States is usually ready to start wars, but is that really a fair assessment? No, not really, still it's not to say that a rogue nation-state despot or dictator should go out of their way to provoke us either. Not long ago, I was discussing this with an acquaintance, and they indicated that; "without wars, the defense industry would not exist in the end."

 

In reality, they don't care what they build really; they just get a contract and set up a project management team, make prototypes, and then manufacture. They could make day-care centers for kids or military bases, they don't care. It's like lawyers, if they cannot practice one type of law, they will try to sue you for something else. We don't live in a world where there is not some crisis to take care of. "But is it ever really possible to rationalize having Us Embassy In many ways I think not. It is Catch-22 for sure. If one have them, more will want to have them, since they get afraid of the one nation getting them in the first place. In the end it is only about killing in a big scale..."

 

This is of course true, and I wish it weren't, I wish we lived in a perfect world, but that's not the world we live in, so we must protect ourselves. In my personal library I have almost a whole row of books on the topic of nuclear proliferation, the Cold War, and many reports put forth during the Cold War by the Rand Corporation. I believe it is scary stuff, and it's quite unfortunate, but it is what it is and we must deal with it without blinders. Please consider all this and think on it. If you have any comments, questions, or concerns you may e-mail me. I will not accept e-mails from anti-nuclear power activists.

Comments: 0 (Discussion closed)
    There are no comments yet.